Common ASDIP Steel Mistakes and How to Avoid ThemASDIP Steel is a powerful structural design software used by engineers for steel connection and member design. While the program streamlines calculations and code compliance checks, misuse or misunderstandings can lead to poor designs, wasted time, and noncompliant documentation. This article covers the most common mistakes engineers make when using ASDIP Steel and provides concrete strategies to avoid them.
1. Entering Incorrect Project Units or Unit Conversions
One of the simplest but most consequential mistakes is using inconsistent units (kip vs. kN, ft vs. m). ASDIP Steel allows different unit systems, but manual input errors or mismatched units between load files and the model cause incorrect results.
How to avoid it
- Always set and verify the project units at the start. Confirm units for forces, lengths, and material properties.
- Prefer consistent SI or Imperial across the model and input sources.
- Double-check imported load values and note unit labels when copying from spreadsheets.
2. Using Default Material Properties without Verification
ASDIP provides default steel grades and material properties, but design codes or project specifications may require different values (e.g., A992 vs. A36, different fy or E).
How to avoid it
- Verify material properties against project specifications and the governing code.
- Manually enter or adjust yield strength (fy), ultimate strength (fu) and modulus (E) when needed.
- Keep a project checklist specifying the steel grade for each member or connection.
3. Overlooking Load Combinations and Load Factors
Relying on a single load case or neglecting code-specified load combinations leads to under-designed or noncompliant elements.
How to avoid it
- Implement all relevant load combinations per the governing code (ASCE/SEI, AISC LRFD/ASD).
- Use ASDIP’s combination tools or import load combinations from the analysis model.
- Check results for all critical combinations and use the worst-case demands for design.
4. Improper Boundary Conditions and Support Modeling
Incorrectly modeled supports or restraints can drastically change internal forces and moments, leading to unsafe designs.
How to avoid it
- Match ASDIP model boundary conditions to your global analysis model.
- Pay attention to rotational restraints, pinned vs. fixed supports, and bracing conditions.
- If using ASDIP for stand-alone design, explicitly document assumptions about supports.
5. Ignoring Bolt and Weld Details
Acceptable connection capacity depends heavily on bolt type, pretension, edge distances, and weld size. Leaving defaults or sketchy details can produce unrealistic capacities.
How to avoid it
- Specify bolt type (e.g., A325, A490), hole types, and pretension where applicable.
- Enter correct edge distances, gauge, and spacing per AISC and ASDIP requirements.
- Define weld types, lengths, and sizes accurately; check throat calculations and weld detail report.
6. Misinterpreting Connection Strength vs. Member Strength
Design checks may show connection OK, but the connected member might govern (or vice versa). Treating connection capacity as the sole check is risky.
How to avoid it
- Compare connection capacity to member capacity—both must be adequate.
- Run checks for shear, tension, bearing, block shear, and combined stresses.
- Ensure the weakest link (member or connection) governs the design and revise accordingly.
7. Overreliance on Auto-Optimize without Engineering Judgment
ASDIP’s optimize or auto-select features can save time but may choose impractical sections or connections.
How to avoid it
- Use auto-select as a starting point, then review practicality (fabrication, availability, erection).
- Check deflections, lateral-torsional buckling, and serviceability, not just strength.
- Apply engineering judgment: consider welding difficulty, plate sizes, and connection congestion.
8. Neglecting Serviceability Checks
Focusing only on strength (LRFD/ASD capacity) while overlooking deflection, vibration, and fatigue leads to unsatisfactory performance.
How to avoid it
- Run deflection checks for service load combinations and compare to specified limits (L/360, L/480, etc.).
- Consider vibration-sensitive members and perform dynamic assessments if necessary.
- Include fatigue checks for cyclic loads and detail welds/bolts accordingly.
9. Poor Documentation and Drawing Output
Designers sometimes accept ASDIP outputs without verifying that drawings and reports contain all necessary fabrication and erection details.
How to avoid it
- Review ASDIP reports thoroughly; ensure all input assumptions and key results are documented.
- Export connection drawings and detail sheets; cross-check dimensions, bolt information, welds, and plate sizes.
- Add fabrication notes, material callouts, and tolerances to shop drawings.
10. Not Updating Designs after Code or Load Changes
Designs often begin early in a project; changes in loads, codes, or project requirements are common but sometimes not propagated into ASDIP models.
How to avoid it
- Maintain version control for ASDIP files and document changes.
- Re-run designs after any load, member, or code change.
- Keep a change log that links ASDIP outputs to the analysis model and project specifications.
11. Misunderstanding Code Options and_parameters
ASDIP supports multiple codes and options (LRFD vs. ASD, different AISC editions). Selecting the wrong code or option causes mismatches.
How to avoid it
- Confirm the governing code edition and ensure ASDIP is set accordingly.
- Be familiar with where ASDIP applies reduction factors, phi factors, and resistance factors.
- When in doubt, consult code provisions or a senior engineer for interpretation.
12. Inadequate Checking of Lateral-Torsional Buckling and Bracing
Members and connections can fail due to lateral-torsional buckling if unbraced lengths or torsional restraints are mis-specified.
How to avoid it
- Enter correct unbraced lengths, flange/bracing conditions, and restraining effects.
- Check for both local and global buckling per code requirements.
- Model bracing locations carefully and reflect them in the connection design.
13. Forgetting Temperature Effects and Special Loads
Thermal expansion, erection loads, and differential settlements can change load paths and stress distributions.
How to avoid it
- Consider temperature load cases when relevant (long spans, roof purlins, bridges).
- Account for construction/erection loads and staged loading where ASDIP supports staged checks.
- Model support settlements or provide details for accommodating movement.
14. Incomplete Use of ASDIP’s Verification and Diagnostic Outputs
ASDIP offers checks, warnings, and intermediate calculations that are sometimes ignored.
How to avoid it
- Review warning and error messages; they often point to input mistakes or code violations.
- Use ASDIP’s intermediate outputs (interaction diagrams, capacity tables) for cross-checks.
- Validate key numbers manually for critical connections.
15. Not Coordinating with Fabrication and Erection Teams
Designs made without fabrication input can produce impractical details: awkward welds, congested bolt patterns, or plates that are hard to handle.
How to avoid it
- Get input from fabricators early—bolt sizes, shop welding, handling limits.
- Consider standard bolt patterns and plate dimensions for easier fabrication.
- Include erection sequence considerations and temporary bracing details.
Practical checklist before finalizing ASDIP Steel designs
- Units verified and consistent.
- Material properties confirmed per specs.
- All load combinations applied and worst-case results used.
- Supports/bracing match the global model.
- Bolt/weld details specified and checked.
- Serviceability checks (deflection, vibration) performed.
- Code edition/settings correct.
- Fabrication/erection constraints considered.
- Warnings/errors reviewed and resolved.
- Change log/version control maintained.
Example: Typical mistake and fix (bolt spacing)
Mistake: Using ASDIP default spacing that violates edge distance limits, causing reduced bearing capacity.
Fix:
- Check plate edge distances per AISC (minimum se = 1.5 x bolt diameter for bearing in shear, etc.).
- Update spacing and gauge in ASDIP.
- Rerun bearing and shear checks; verify bolt shear and block shear capacities.
Design software speeds engineering work but doesn’t replace engineering judgment. Use ASDIP Steel as a precise calculator and documentation tool while applying code knowledge, fabrication practicality, and thorough verification.
Leave a Reply